Close

Aishwarya Rai vs Deepfakes: Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Celebrity Rights

  • Home
  •  / 
  • Delhi High Court
  •  / 
  • Aishwarya Rai vs Deepfakes: Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Celebrity Rights

Aishwarya Rai vs Deepfakes: Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Celebrity Rights

Introduction

In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court has stepped in to protect the personality rights of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. The Court issued an interim injunction preventing the unauthorized use of her name, image, voice, initials (ARB), and likeness—especially in the wake of AI-generated deepfakes and online impersonation.

This case highlights how Indian courts are adapting to the challenges posed by technology, AI, and digital exploitation of celebrity identities.

Background of the Case

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan filed a suit after discovering her identity was being misused online. Offending activities included:

  • Fake endorsements using her name and photos
  • Sale of unauthorized merchandise (mugs, T-shirts, posters)
  • Circulation of AI-generated and morphed intimate content
  • Websites and e-commerce platforms exploiting her brand value without permission

She argued that such misuse violated not just her commercial rights but also her dignity, privacy, and reputation.

Delhi High Court’s Observations

Justice Tejas Karia noted that:

  • Aishwarya Rai had established a prima facie case for relief.
  • The balance of convenience lay in her favour.
  • Without Court intervention, she risked irreparable harm to her reputation and goodwill.

The Court also acknowledged that with the rise of AI and deepfake technology, misuse of celebrity identity has become a growing threat that needs urgent judicial protection.

The Interim Order (9 September 2025)

The Court passed an ex parte interim injunction with wide-ranging directions:

  1. Restraint on misuse – No use of her name, likeness, or other persona attributes without consent.
  2. AI and deepfake ban – No AI-generated, morphed, or manipulated content involving her.
  3. Merchandise prohibition – No unauthorized sale of goods carrying her image or initials.
  4. Platform accountability – Google, e-commerce sites, and digital intermediaries must remove infringing URLs within 72 hours of notice.
  5. Government action – MeitY and DoT directed to block infringing websites and URLs.
  6. Transparency – Platforms to disclose details of sellers/uploaders behind the misuse.

Why This Judgment Matters

This ruling is significant because it:

  • Strengthens the legal recognition of personality rights in India
  • Links personality rights to privacy, dignity, and fundamental rights
  • Addresses AI-driven misuse, setting a precedent for future cases involving deepfakes and online impersonation
  • Places responsibility on intermediaries like Google and e-commerce platforms to act quickly on takedown requests

What’s Next?

The matter will be taken up again on 15 January 2026, where the Court may consider permanent relief and stronger enforcement mechanisms.

Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s protection of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan’s personality rights marks a milestone in Indian jurisprudence. It sends a strong message that misuse of a celebrity’s identity—whether through deepfakes, AI manipulation, or unauthorized commercial exploitation—will not be tolerated.

This decision is likely to pave the way for more celebrities, influencers, and public figures to seek judicial protection against online impersonation and digital fraud.

Takeaway: The ruling is a landmark precedent in India’s evolving digital law framework, combining intellectual property, privacy, and technology regulation to safeguard individual dignity in the online world.
Share this update

DISCLAIMER

As per the Bar Council of India Rules and as per the Advocates Act, 1961, Law firms are prohibited to advertise or promote their business/profession by way of advertisements and solicitation. The sole purpose of this website is information ONLY and not any kind of advertisement. By clicking on the “I agree”, the user acknowledges the following:

  • No advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort or whatsoever has been initiated from any of our team members to solicit any work from this website.
  • The user wishes to have detailed information about us for his/her own personal use and information.
  • The information about our firm is provided to the user on his/her request and any information obtained or any material downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s violation and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.